Modeling Psychological Factors Affecting Audit Quality in the Iranian Auditing Community Using a Mixed-Methods Approach
Keywords:
grounded theory approach, auditing community, audit quality, Psychological factorsAbstract
The purpose of this study is to model the psychological factors affecting audit quality in the Iranian auditing community using a mixed-methods approach and grounded theory. This study is fundamental in terms of its objective and exploratory in nature. To collect data, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted alongside library research and questionnaires. The statistical population includes experts, specialists, and university faculty members in the field of auditing. In the qualitative phase, participants were selected using purposive and snowball sampling methods. In the quantitative phase, the sample size was determined using Morgan's table, and a simple random sampling method was employed. Data analysis was carried out in three stages: open coding, axial coding, and selective coding, leading to the extraction of initial conceptual statements, categorical statements, and four main categories. The findings indicate that psychological factors affecting audit quality fall into four main categories: individual factors, interpersonal factors, environmental and organizational factors, and cognitive and decision-making factors. Path analysis results show that all these factors have a significant impact on audit quality. The study's findings suggest that the effect of psychological factors on audit quality is both direct and indirect, and the interaction of these factors can lead to either an improvement or deterioration in audit quality. Identifying, understanding, and properly managing these factors help organizations and auditors enhance their performance and improve audit quality.
References
L. Chu, H. Fogel-Yaari, and P. Zhang, "The Estimated Propensity to Issue Going Concern Audit Reports and Audit Quality," Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, vol. 39, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.1177/0148558X221079011.
J. Muterera and J. A. Brettle, "Exploring the impact of auditor well-being on audit quality," International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 212-228, 2024.
A. Wieland, F. Kock, and A. Josiassen, "Scale purification: state-of-the-art review and guidelines," International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 3346-3362, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2017-0740.
T. Jones and S. F. Taylor, "Service loyalty: accounting for social capital," Journal of Services Marketing, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 60-74, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041211199733.
L. Gao, I. I. Melero-Polo, and F. J. Sese, "Customer equity drivers, customer experience quality, and customer profitability in banking services," Journal of Service Research, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 174-193, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670519856119.
P. Kabalski and M. Nowak, "The potential of using psychometric tests in Polish accounting research," Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 91-116, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.0885.
S. Rajgopal, S. Srinivasan, and X. Zheng, "Measuring audit quality," Review of Accounting Studies, vol. 26, pp. 559-619, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-020-09570-9.
Y. Ponomareva, T. Uman, P. Broberg, E. Vinberg, and K. Karlsson, "Commercialization of audit firms and auditors' subjective well-being," Meditari Accountancy Research, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 565-585, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-10-2018-0384.
G. Franke and M. Sarstedt, "Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison," 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0515.
D. A. K. Pawitra and D. Suhartini, "The influence of individual behavioral aspects toward audit judgment: The mediating role of self-efficacy," Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 264-273, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v22i2.1755.
S. C. Lee, J. M. Su, S. B. Tsai, T. L. Lu, and W. Dong, "A comprehensive survey of government auditors' self-efficacy and professional development for improving audit quality," SpringerPlus, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-25, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2903-0.
E. N. Johnson, D. J. Lowe, and P. M. Reckers, "The influence of mood on subordinates' ability to resist coercive pressure in public accounting," Contemporary Accounting Research, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 261-287, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12141.
J. Muterera, "Validation of the auditor's self-efficacy scale," Journal of Finance and Accounting, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 43-51, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.12691/jfa-12-1-3.
I. Ayemere, "The effects of time pressure and conscientiousness on internal auditors' performance," Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 127-144, 2023.
L. Y. Lee and A. Mohammed Isa, "Client narcissism and audit quality: The moderating role of auditors' self-esteem," Accounting Review, p. Advance online publication, 2022.
S. A. Hairston and M. R. Brooks, "Derivative accounting and financial reporting quality: A review of the literature," Advances in Accounting, vol. 44, pp. 81-94, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2018.10.003.
S. Buchheit, D. W. Dalton, N. L. Harp, and C. W. Hollingsworth, "Auditors' bias and sub-conscious processing: Implications for audit quality," Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 51, pp. 167-183, 2019.
D. Detzen and A. Gold, "The different shades of audit quality: A review of the academic literature," Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie, vol. 95, no. 1/2, pp. 5-15, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.5117/mab.95.60608.
A. H. Ismail, N. M. Merejok, M. R. Mat Dangi, and S. Saad, "Does audit quality matter in Malaysian public sector auditing?," Journal of Academia, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 102-116, 2019.
R. Krishnan, W. L. Koe, R. Othman, G. Muthusamy, and N. E. Alias, "The moderating effect of self-efficacy in the relationship between perceived job characteristics and work engagement," Management & Accounting Review (MAR), vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 79-92, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.24191/mar.v17i2.790.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Keramat Bizar (Author); Seyedhossein Naslmosavi; Aliakbar Ramezani (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.